The ZPD


Whew!  That Mind in Society book was a tough one.  I had to use some reading strategies of my own to fully grasp what he was saying and understand his beliefs about development and learning.  I found a graphic which helped me understand the zone of proximal development more concretely through the link below and my group and I used this as inspiration for our mind map showing how, according to Vygotsky, developing and learning happen.


            I now understand that Vygotzky believed that development lags behind learning.  The zone of proximal development (ZPD) is the distance between a child’s actual development level and the level of potential development.  There is a huge social component too and Vygotsky believed that development stems from social interactions.  He says, “what children can do with the assistance of others is even more indicative of their mental development than what they can do alone.”  He goes on to say, “what a child can do with assistance today she will be able to do by herself tomorrow.”  

This matches up nicely with the idea of modeling, coaching and fading (no coincidence as Brown, Collins and Duguid no doubt studied Vygotsky carefully!). These beliefs are ones to keep in mind while designing our instruction too as well as essential ideas to keep in mind as we consider the fourth design principle: The Learning Principle.  We want to keep our students “at the edge of their knowledge” (ZPD) and we want them to “internalize meaningful thought.” 

I will keep all this at the forefront of my thoughts as I start the Design Document this week.  As a resource teacher I work with many grade-levels and in both reading and math, but I think I will focus this Design Document on first grade math.  This age seems like a good one to design for with these principles in mind since they still have so much developing and learning to do.  Wish me luck!

           


Comments

  1. That's an awesome graphic! Thanks for sharing :)

    I definitely connected Vygotsky and Brown, Collins, and Duguid, specifically when they discussed cognitive apprenticeship.

    As you are thinking of your design document, maybe keep in mind what type of professionals you could potentially reach out to who are experts in the content you are teaching! I always think, "what are the standards?" "Who does this in the real world"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. That would have been an awesome graphic to have in the book!
    I think choosing first grade was a good idea! I decided to go with fourth grade and I almost feel like there is too much to teach :). I think you are on the right track with Vygotsky, mental/social development is so important.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that the graphic would have been a great addition to this book! Thank you for sharing it with us!

    You said, " I now understand that Vygotzky believed that development lags behind learning." This was also a "take a way" for me. I also considered FCPS fourth grade VA Studies Curriculum and the design and level of thinking strategies that they are now embedding into the lessons, which is entirely necessary. Will this higher level of thinking/learning help student's developmental levels increase? It will. I also believe this applies to teacher expectations and behavioral issues.

    Wishing you luck on your Design Document!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for helping to simplify Vygotsky for me. I'm still not a fan of the book, but at least now I understood what he meant. Your ZPD definition is possibly the clearest one I've read yet. I'm interested to know how your design document will encompass these principles. I'm still considering how to incorporate them into mine.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment